Procurement, operations & the systems behind better work.
Geopolitics

Germany's Industrial Model Is Under Pressure

Expensive energy, weaker demand, and new competition are testing assumptions that held for decades.

2 min read
Germany's Industrial Model Is Under Pressure

Germany's industrial model worked for decades. Reliable Russian gas kept energy-intensive production competitive, strong export demand supported manufacturing, and German engineering carried a reputation customers were willing to pay for. Several of those conditions changed at once.

While writing my thesis at TU Darmstadt on European electricity markets and energy security, one dependency kept appearing in the data. German industrial competitiveness rested partly on affordable energy from one supplier. When Russian pipeline gas stopped, the exposure was no longer theoretical.

Higher energy costs arrived while the United States was subsidizing domestic investment and Chinese manufacturers were becoming stronger competitors. German producers were paying more at home while facing supported production elsewhere. A rate cut cannot solve that difference.

The economy contracted in both 2023 and 2024. The automotive sector had to fund an expensive shift toward electric vehicles while demand weakened and Chinese brands improved. BASF announced permanent closures at Ludwigshafen. Volkswagen's December 2024 agreement reduced planned capacity at German sites. These were decisions about the future size of production, not small efficiency measures.

It is tempting to treat this as a normal downturn. Energy prices may ease, demand may recover, and individual companies may regain ground. The larger concern is that the conditions supporting the old model have changed. Germany now has to decide which kinds of manufacturing it can keep competitive and what it is willing to spend to do so.

The country still has deep engineering knowledge, skilled workers, and a network of mid-sized suppliers that competitors cannot copy quickly. Those strengths buy time. They do not remove the need for faster investment decisions, reliable energy policy, and less administrative delay.

The likely risk is not a sudden collapse. It is a gradual loss of plants, suppliers, and experienced workers. Each closure makes the next investment less attractive because part of the surrounding industrial network has already gone. By the time the change becomes obvious in national statistics, much of the useful capacity may be difficult to rebuild.